<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>QuirkUniverse.com &#187; telekinesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quirkuniverse.com/tag/telekinesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quirkuniverse.com</link>
	<description>Me: &#34;Dude, check out this video I saw online...&#34; You:  Reading This Now Going &#34;Uh ok.&#34;.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Researching Mind Over Matter &#8211; Can Thought Alone Influence Reflecting Light?</title>
		<link>http://quirkuniverse.com/2009/04/researching-mind-over-matter-can-thought-alone-influence-reflecting-light/</link>
		<comments>http://quirkuniverse.com/2009/04/researching-mind-over-matter-can-thought-alone-influence-reflecting-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telekinesis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quirkuniverse.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer, it would appear, is yes. The latest issue of Wired magazine includes a tiny snippet about a University of Colorado at Boulder research professor, Garret Moddel,whose work is showing some interesting results on the power of thought to influence matter. The experiment involves a beam of light aimed at a glass slide and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer, it would appear, is yes.</p>
<p>The latest issue of Wired magazine includes a tiny snippet about a University of Colorado at Boulder research professor, Garret Moddel,whose work is showing some interesting results on the power of thought to influence matter.</p>
<p>The experiment involves a beam of light aimed at a glass slide and then measuring its reflection. Subjects are to mentally project the idea to increase the amount of reflected light.</p>
<p>Without anyone &#8220;thinking&#8221; about it, the amount of reflection is 8%.</p>
<p>With the subjects intention to increase the amount of reflection, it goes up to 8.005%.</p>
<p>In reverse, the subjects were also able to decrease the amount of reflected ligh. (Percentage unavailable.)</p>
<p>On one hand, this does sound somewhat trivial. It&#8217;s only .005% of a difference.</p>
<p>Is it no more important than other really weird bits of knowledge -  for example, due to the complex nature of gravity and time, <em>technically</em>, time passes at a different rate for someone on the 5th floor of a building than someone on the 1st floor.</p>
<p>But stacking this example up next to this research doesn&#8217;t really mean anything to me as far as dismissing it. It just shows how weird reality is.</p>
<p>I wish I would see this type of research funded from  different angles. What would happen if the subjects were placed at a distance? What would happen if there were walls or other physical objects placed in between the subjects and object? Does it make a difference if more people are involved? Less people? 1 person? 10 million? Male? Female? And what else can be influenced by thought?Can this research and the same results be duplicated by other scientists?</p>
<p>This experiment reminds me of another wherein which subject were able to influence the outcome of random number generators. It was only by a tiny amount, but, nevertheless, there you have it:  <strong>thought alone influencing matter</strong>, right? Doesn&#8217;t that count as telekinesis? If not, why not? And now here&#8217;s a second study purporting to show the same thing &#8211; what am I missing?</p>
<p><a title="Mad Scientists" href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-05/st_madscientists" target="_blank">Click here for the original Wired Article</a>. (it will open in a new window)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quirkuniverse.com/2009/04/researching-mind-over-matter-can-thought-alone-influence-reflecting-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

